Bloglines - Someone roll me a MeTube

Bloglines user PeterDawson (slash.pd@gmail.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

this is a good idea..hypothtical model on the stack can be formed ?

---

FactoryCity This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.

Someone roll me a MeTube By Chris Messina on Barcamp So apparently those crafty cats up at BarCampVancouver were chattin’ up an open source alternative to YouTube, smartly backed by Amazon’s S3 mass-storage service. Serve the files with Drupal, passing the media files into the open source Flow Player or aptly-named Flash Video Player, and you’re nine-tenths to bein’ illegal (as they say). Now, that’s pretty hawt, if I do say so myself. But, here’s what I pitched to the Flock guys last night at their SF meetup: why isn’t there an extension for browsers that takes any media file (I’m primarily referring to video, but audio support tends to be flakey too), sends it off to some server-side transcoding service and re-embeds a Flash file in place of the original media — that’ll play no matter what system you’re on? I mean, this would be better than just distributing a player with the browsers… it would actually solve the cross-platform issue entirely (okay, so the Linux folks still need an up-to-date Flash player). I’ve never been a big fan of Flash (for a number of reasons) but as it’s clearly the most cross-platform compatible format for sending out video and it’s not always possible for producers to generate Flash video, this solution would reside on the client-side, perhaps as a subscription-based service (owing the costs of licensing the all the codecs and so on). I mean, until we get wide-spread adoption of open source video codecs and formats that are as good as the proprietary ones, this seems like a good stop gap solution. Don’t it? Comments

Introvets and networks#1

Sacha - moderator
Blog every day - small talk hurdles.
Geekette and cool stuff and technology.
Blog is about personal thoughts which over comes shyness.
Buttons and stuff like are invitains for conversations.
Sticker on the laptop help break barriers.
Think more - based on conversation..
Rodney- technology eveanglist . Talk about what are you passinate about.
Vlalue is fundumentally beaccessible either online or offline. Meeting half way.
Ego shift - is basically shifting the persons ego- best bet cal them by name.
Open the circle of conversations.
Introducue people and help people break. The ice.
Read about body launguage and understand the signs

Sent via BlackBerry on the Bell Mobility network

Bloglines - Missing the point

Bloglines user PeterDawson (slash.pd@gmail.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

quoateable quote !! ")-

"Companies with pure hearts will trump companies with money in the end. I'm a hippie 2.0. I have eternal faith in karma. You will never convince me otherwise"

---

::HorsePigCow:: marketing uncommon ...helping you find a cure for 'viral'...

Missing the point By miss rogue A couple of months back, someone asked me why I'm such an extremist. Surely, everything traditional marketing can't be bad. Why not be a big more moderate. I replied, I'm an extremist because someone has to swing the pendulum over. Here is a diagram to illustrate what I mean: You see, if I just sat on the fence, meeting halfway, wouldn't mean much. Because I'm extreme, meeting halfway means that there is a major shift on both sides. Of course, I wouldn't mind if the pendulum swung all of the way over...'cause it's the happy side for communities...but hey. I am not really an unreasonable person. I'm actually very much a fan of finding the 'right' situation for clients. That is why the whole debate on viral is really quite silly in the end (including my involvement in it). There are a couple of things that I have learnt in my career that are not absolutes - but are good ideas to absorb: No amount of money, pressure, cleverness, 'viralness', advertising, MySpace pandering, p.r., community building, or 'story' telling, etc. can save a crappy product. People don't give a flying snake. (for JP) I have gone into many clients and employers to find them 'chomping at the bit' to grow the buzz and get adoption while their products are buggy, slow, crashy, broken, etc. Why would you want to spread something that is going to leave a bad impression? All of a sudden, word of mouth becomes extremely damaging. Why not gather a group of focused and understanding early adopters who are willing to work with you to improve what you are building, THEN when it is kickass, unleash it and put a bit of pressure on. No matter how 'cool' you are, someone else is probably 'cooler'. And if you are the 'coolest', you probably won't be that for long. In other words, enjoy your 'clear blue ocean' because in a capitalist mindset, competition isn't far behind. And they are often younger, brighter, more agile and hungrier than you. Especially after you've been the reigning 'King of the Castle' for a while. So, how do you combat that? Well, you may have a better advantage when people love you (instead of just thinking you are 'cool'). That's where strong communities mean longevity comes into play. Quite often, that thing that you thought was the 'killer app' turns out to be nothing and that side project that you dismissed because you didn't think it had a broad appeal takes off like wildfire. Maybe it isn't monetizable, or you don't think there is a 'market' for it - but you've been throwing all of this energy and money and time behind the promotion of something you just can't figure out why it doesn't take off and all of a sudden, you notice that this feature or this side project has become super popular. Don't fight it. I've seen so many companies kill it because they use that popularity to try and steer people back towards the 'main' project or, even worse, they integrate it into the main project. Watch, observe...water it, garden it...understand why is happening. You don't find or create community. Community happens...well...sometimes. I've walked into countless projects where there was some sort of marketing plan laid out early in the game. 'The Target Market is A, B and C' - which usually means they've covered the entire gamut of possible people on the planet except for who is actually using their product. The issue is that these companies continue to go after these 'Target Markets' - trying to build community where nobody is interested, whilst alienating and/or ignoring the actual community that is building up...to a long term detriment. It's fine to guess at who may find your product useful, but don't throw your energy behind that group until you see it actually manifesting. I've always believed in a much more organic way of researching these things. Let's put it out there and be part of that community...watching who gathers, understanding the real appeal and building the future of the product in that direction. I don't mean to do this to everyone else's exclusion, but seeding and building in specific directions is crucial to community growth. Being vulnerable is often your best defense/offense. Open source is the most vulnerable thing I know. Code that is open, free, available, transparent, etc. Anyone can and will come along and scoop it up and make it their own and make money off of it, etc. There are all sorts of jerks around the world who burn Firefox onto a CD, package it up and sell it for $29.95 to people who don't know that it is free for download online. They laugh all the way to the bank. But not as much as Firefox does. What was it? $72 million last year? I doubt that CD burner dude makes enough to replace a full time salary. S/he certainly couldn't get into major retailers - Firefox has built a strong reputation. A name. A community of people, gathered to protect it. That's not the only example. Making oneself publicly vulnerable is scary. Putting yourself 'out there', offering up source code, telling your 'secrets', involving your community (which could include...your enemies!) - yikes. There is something to be said for surprise and delight - which is a whole other story, but my point is that community is built on trust and someone who puts themselves out there honestly has a leg up when it comes to community. If you aren't Hugh Macleod, Guy Kawasaki or Seth Godin, you probably couldn't get away with Stormhoek, Film Loop or Squidoo. In fact, they have a tough time getting away with them. Their own 'brands' are worth way more and the minute they step back, they will still be Hugh, Guy and Seth (marketing superheroes), but Stormhoek will be just another bottle of wine, Film Loop will be...um?..., and Squidoo will be just another abandoned social network. Either way, I respect all three of them a great deal more than I've expressed here, but the point here is that none of them could get away with what they have if they were, say, me. Any agency or person who says they are a viral marketing expert is full of it. And this is damaging to the entire industry. So many agencies win business because they go in and pitch bull about being able to create brilliant campaigns that will make the world fall in love with a company's brand. And so many companies end up disappointed in the results. Which results in a general distrust of marketing. Which nobody seems to learn from. We get oodles of phonecalls and emails from companies that ask whether we can build a viral campaign that will drive 100,000 people to their website. I always answer no. Even if we think we may be able to, based on them having an amazing product and our connection to strong communities that would like their product. They've completely missed the point. But the problem is...they just talked to 3 other agencies that said they could. Unironically. It makes me want to cry. I've watched perfectly great products tank because of this attitude. Companies with pure hearts will trump companies with money in the end. I'm a hippie 2.0. I have eternal faith in karma. You will never convince me otherwise. When it comes to forumulas and absolutes and buzzwords and case studies and lists of 10 things to do (heh), marketers are missing the point. Relationships take time. They take trust. They take real connection. Sometimes you can mass produce some sort of connection, like JetBlue does with the 'experience' it creates for passengers - from the language on the screens to the blue chips it serves to the way it has removed class distinctions from the seating - and in the end, they have a business and want my money and if I asked them to help me move, they would laugh at me. I think. But then again, a PlanePurple may come along tomorrow that gives me the same level of service and I'll probably switch without thought (or I may just pick the cheapest flight - commoditizing the whole damned process). And community building on a truly personal level is not scalable, so all of you traditional marketers and advertisers can continue to buy up your billboards and tv ads, etc., because in your world, numbers matter...no...big numbers matter. I've done the numbers game. There is nothing satisfying in it for me. I like looking at the world in a non-zero-sum way (thanks Kevin!) and hope for a time when the world flattens (not in a Thomas Friedman sense, but in a 'we all get a nice piece of the pie we worked for', which is, I suppose, the Chris Anderson sense). The bar is set excrutiatingly low. A little kindness goes a long way in a world filled with unfriendly and disempowering consumer experiences. I spend so much energy feeling ripped off that when a company does the smallest thing to show me they give a shit about me, I throw my whole being into their promotion. I'm not the only one. Egad, we need something to give. And I know my ideas are extreme, but they come from a real place of wanting to continue to hold onto my world filled with good, real people who give a snake about others. And, no, I won't just get real. If it doesn't exist right now, I want to dedicate my life to making it exist. I don't care what you call it or how it happens. Damn. Another list of 10. See, I'm not altogether unreasonable. ;) tags: pinkomarketing, marketing

Bloglines - Suggestions for the new coComment (Ideas)

Bloglines user PeterDawson (slash.pd@gmail.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

whats a "Cocobar" ?

---

coComments related to steph coComments related to steph

Suggestions for the new coComment (Ideas) By jackyan jackyan says: Down to 12–14 sec. The delay is now when coComment “logs in” and the Cocobar links to my nickname.

Aids 2006- live blogging

This is crazy. Steve harper not present. Co-chair Wienburg blasts the PM.

1/3rd of viticms originate from aboriginal demogrpahics
Life is the most important thing in life-micelle jean-lt.Gov of canada
Global communities need to be build for lessons of humanity.
Stigmaize and condemenation is the root problem.
By 2010 - 18 million children will have no parents- orphan creation ?
Where is the declartion of commitment ?
Bill gates present for this event.
To give up would be irresponsible.
Every life is precious in every corner of this world.

Sent via BlackBerry on the Bell Mobility network

Bloglines - CrunchGear Launched Today

Bloglines user PeterDawson (slash.pd@gmail.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

Mike is foking is folio too too much. He' needs to either focus on one or the other... or does he want to become the next Alan M (read jupitermedia) for web3.0 ??

---

CrunchNotes

CrunchGear Launched Today By Mike on Web2.0 I hinted at this yesterday in a post - today we launched CrunchGear, a new blog about new gadgets, gear and computer hardware. CunchGear is going to be different from the other gadget blogs out there. The team is committed to writing about breaking news but will also be featuring weekly product comparisons in a given category. Expect CrunchGear to look like something between a pure blog and CNET Reviews. Our goal isn’t just to let you know about the hot new stuff coming out soon, but to also help you decide what kind of camera, laptop or MP3 player you want to buy as well. More stuff coming this month… Comments

good Quote

"And when your caché is innovation and constant coolification, you've always gotta deliver something wicked to knock 'em dead"

via :chris

--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

Pls 4give me !

 really messed up. Bigtime. Seriously. I can't believe I did that. Can you forgeeeeeeeeeeeeve me please? :)-

 

--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

Bloglines - ...

Bloglines user PeterDawson (slash.pd@gmail.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

Sutha, of Ambient posted during the TechMob lunch. This is a photo blogging interface. Not sure, which blog platforms are compatiable. The Voice Tag was not working out for me on tis round.. and can a podcast search function work on those tags ?? Now, That would be an interesting experiment !!

In short, interesting bit of innovations to play in .. btw, next to me is Mark Evans, Sr.Tech writer for the National Post, Toronto.

---

Ambient Thoughts

... By Sutha Posted straight from my phone with Nakama. Click to see more.

Privat Google -Real time

The publish a real-time report of all of the headlines that Google News indexes on the home page. The results are ranked by day and time, prominence, number of appearances, etc.
--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

dot2.0 definations

* Galaxies: centers of gravity that attract the like-minded - e.g. YouTube, Digg and Second Life
* Stars: online celebs, such as Robert Scoble, Thomas Hawk, AskaNiinja, etc.
* Planets: individuals who follow the stars, yet are influential in their own right
* Shooting Stars: insta-celebs that create viral videos or memes and then fade
* Comets : recurring themes, such as transparency, veracity and entitlement
* Asteroids: desolate, lifeless places with negative energy — think splogs

Via : Micro Persuasion
--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

360Degree turn around

why is Scoble's doing a 360 turn on MSFT ?

 

"No, now Google is holding Scoble's corporate email too! And, those servers know which emails I delete, which ones I forward, which ones I click on. It even "optimizes" those emails by pulling out spam. How nice."

 

Whatever happend to that exhange server post and keeping things within the enterprise ?? I remember him cribbing on gmail for corproations.. and now he is using it and praising google .. Oh welcome to the club Scobles :)- More follows, when I digg deeper into your various blog entries

 

Ok onto another strand..

 

"give  +us+ control of our "optimizations" (er, attention data) and we'll be on your side. Behave like Microsoft of old and we'll just stick with Google. "

 

did he jsut give a thread to MSFT ??  :)-
--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

Ben Metcalfe & Barcamp

"All you need to do is create an environment that promotes mingling and networking — something to break the ice and help people make the right contacts.  That's not just an unConference it's a non-conference. "
 

 

 Ben Metcalfe is advocating the Barcamp princple here

--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

be my friend , please !! :)_

--
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

Bloglines - Markets are...

Bloglines user PeterDawson (slash.pd@gmail.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

No.. !!, markets are not about sellers and buyers. Lovemarks and hughtrain differs !!


Markets are infinitive !! Go.. and dicypher that !!

---

::HorsePigCow:: life uncommon Marketing? Me? I spend a good deal of time railing against marketing and consumerism, but I am by profession a marketing ...erm... professional. People are individuals, not 'targets'; they are producers, not consumers; and 'we' (being marketers) are 'they' and 'we' should never forget that. I call my technique Pinko Marketing - Commons-Based Unmarketing.

Markets are... By miss rogue They were once upon a time spaces... Then somewhere along the way they became targets (*shudder*)... Then they became conversations... And now Doc says they are relationships... Personally, I think Markets are a figment of our imagination...a dream...a result of wishful thinking. We think they exist because we want them to. There are people who need stuff and there are more people who provide/create/etc. stuff, who are also people who need stuff. And these people are flowing back and forth between those two 'worlds', which aren't worlds at all - there is really only one world. So, in essence, there are really only people and sometimes we need stuff and sometimes we sell stuff. To reduce these complex relationships to a monolithic idea of a market, actually seriously understimates the possibilities of how these relationships can further us in general.